Why martial law wont happen

Yet the concept has never been well understood. The Constitution does not mention martial law, and no act of Congress defines it. Constantin, U. Peabody, U. Borden, 48 U. This report aims to clear up the confusion that surrounds martial law.

To do so, it draws on recent legal scholarship, the few rules that can be gleaned from Supreme Court precedent, and general principles of constitutional law. It concludes that under current law, the president lacks any authority to declare martial law. Congress might be able to authorize a presidential declaration of martial law, but this has not been conclusively decided.

State officials do have the power to declare martial law, but their actions under the declaration must abide by the U. Constitution and are subject to review in federal court. Outside of these general principles, there are many questions that simply cannot be answered given the sparse and confusing legal precedent. Moreover, although lacking authority to replace civilian authorities with federal troops, the president has ample authority under current law to deploy troops to assist civilian law enforcement.

For example, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in , the military deployed helicopters along the Gulf Coast to carry out search-and-rescue missions that local governments were unable to do themselves. For example, state and federal troops were deployed to help police suppress the Los Angeles riots. Third, on some occasions, the military has taken the place of the civilian government.

It describes a power that, in an emergency, allows the military to push aside civilian authorities and exercise jurisdiction over the population of a particular area. Laws are enforced by soldiers rather than local police. Policy decisions are made by military officers rather than elected officials. People accused of crimes are brought before military tribunals rather than ordinary civilian courts.

In short, the military is in charge. This is a dramatic departure from normal practice in the United States. The U. Martial law turns that relationship on its head. The displacement of civilian government distinguishes it from other emergency powers, such as the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus.

Suspending the writ allows the government to detain and hold individuals without charge but does not imply any unusual role for the armed forces. While a declaration of martial law might be accompanied by a suspension of habeas corpus, they are distinct concepts. Martial law has not always meant what it does today. Collins, Martial Law and English Laws, c. This is the law that applies when a soldier is court-martialed.

Before that time, the idea of allowing military rule in an emergency was considered outrageous — as evidenced by the national reaction to the first declaration of martial law in U. In December , toward the end of the War of , Gen. Andrew Jackson led a small army in the defense of New Orleans against a much larger invading British force.

As part of his defensive preparations, Jackson imposed martial law on the city. He censored the press, enforced a curfew, and detained numerous civilians without charge. Moreover, he continued military rule for more than two months after his famous victory at the Battle of New Orleans had ended any real threat from the British.

Jackson argued that his actions were justified because the government in New Orleans had ceased to function as a result of the impending British attack, leaving the military as the only body able to protect the city. This was a novel argument, and it did little to explain why he kept the city under martial law for so long. The founding generation had been deeply suspicious of military power. Duncan et al. Syndics, 1 Harr. Similarly, acting Secretary of War Alexander Dallas explained in a letter to Jackson that martial law had no legal existence in the United States outside of the Articles of War, the predecessor to the modern Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Franklin Jameson, eds. Overall, the consensus in was that martial law was simply another term for military law, and that military jurisdiction could extend no further than the armed forces themselves. Jackson paid the fine, and for the next 27 years, nothing more came of the incident. However, in the early s, the now-aging former president orchestrated a campaign in Congress to refund him the cost of the fine, plus interest.

The ensuing congressional refund debates marked the beginning of a shift in how Americans understood martial law. He got exactly what he wanted. In , after efforts to reform this system had been rebuffed for years, a large group of Rhode Islanders led by Thomas Dorr organized its own constitutional convention, adopted a new constitution, held elections, and declared itself the true government of Rhode Island. When Dorr rallied his supporters to assert their authority by force, the Rhode Island General Assembly declared martial law and called out the state militia to suppress the rebellion.

In , the U. By endorsing the constitutionality of martial law, the Supreme Court finished what Congress had started with the refund bill. The Luther decision makes clear that martial law exists as an emergency power that can be invoked in the United States, at least by state legislatures.

But Luther also leaves many questions unanswered. It does not explain the legal basis for martial law, its scope, when it may be declared, or who is authorized to declare it. Indeed, the Supreme Court has never directly held, in Luther or any subsequent case, that the federal government has the power to impose martial law. It assumed the same in another case, but only for the purpose of deciding a narrower legal question.

Neither of those decisions conclusively affirms that a federal martial law power exists. Over time, however, consistency of practice has papered over gaps in the legal theory. The United States made extensive use of martial law during the Civil War, imposing it on border states like Missouri and Kentucky where U. The Confederacy, too, relied on it heavily. Neely Jr. The practice did not end with the war: in the 90 years between the start of the Civil War and the end of World War II, martial law was declared at least 60 times.

What had been manifestly unconstitutional in the eyes of the Louisiana Supreme Court in had become a relatively ordinary part of American life by the end of the 19th century. States — and state governors in particular — have declared martial law far more often than the federal government. However, no state legislature has done so since the Rhode Island General Assembly in Many cases involved the use of the military to reinforce local police. In other cases, however, troops effectively replaced the police, and in some instances, they were used to impose the will of state or local officials rather than to enforce the law.

State officials have sometimes declared martial law in response to violent civil unrest or natural disasters, such as the Akron Riot of or the Galveston hurricane. Far more often, however, they have used martial law to break labor strikes on behalf of business interests. For example, in September , at the request of mine owners, Colorado Governor James Peabody declared martial law in Cripple Creek and Telluride to break a peaceful strike by the Western Federation of Miners.

The Colorado National Guard conducted mass arrests of striking workers and detained them in open-air bull pens. Rivers, 31 F. Misuses of martial law were not confined to Georgia. At the climax of the conflict, Sterling imposed martial law on several counties — despite the total absence of violence or threats of violence — and deployed the Texas National Guard to enforce the regulation.

Our fixed facilities are designed to the force that we have. They are not thousand-bed medical centers all over the United States. They are, for the most part, small community hospitals. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo wrote an op-ed in the New York Times pleading with Trump to increase testing and mobilize the military to help open more hospital beds before the situation spirals out of control.

For now, no major mobilizations have occurred, and the power to call up the National Guard remains with the states, including for drill weekends and other duties. By Sarah Sicard. Mar 17, US military prepping for coronavirus pandemic U. Northern Command is bracing for an outbreak of the new coronavirus on U. By Patricia Kime. This is a humanitarian mission to support health and safety. The U. Supreme court summed it up in a decision stemming from martial law in Hawaii during World War II.

It has been employed in various ways by different people and at different times. What was true in remains true today. Basically, martial law is the temporary replacement of civil government by the military during a period of unrest, explained David Glazier , a professor at Loyola Law School and former U.

Navy officer. It has rarely been used in the U. The last time was in Hawaii, when martial law was instituted following the attack on Pearl Harbor. In , President George H. Bush deployed the National Guard to help state and local law enforcement suppress riots in Los Angeles. Historically, state governors are most likely to declare martial law in cities and counties in their jurisdictions. The federal government's authority to invoke martial law is less settled and has been used sparingly.

The United States Constitution doesn't explicitly mention martial law. No federal statute or U. Supreme Court decision clearly states who has the authority to declare martial law and under what circumstances.

Constitutional law scholars who study executive power and the origin of martial law note that the President is the commander in chief of the military. But Congress regulates when and where the military can be used for activities, like civilian law enforcement, typically associated with martial law.

While lacking authority to unilaterally declare martial law, under the Insurrection Act the President has limited authority to deploy troops to suppress a domestic rebellion and enforce federal law. But federal troops deployed pursuant to the Insurrection Act are a supplement to civilian government, not a replacement. President John F. Kennedy invoked the Insurrection Act in and to send federal troops to Mississippi and Alabama to enforce civil rights laws.

The U.